Burning gay pride flag
"I think it's sad that the rainbow has become the symbol of a movement and a lifestyle that very much flaunts a disordered sexuality and is opposed to the virtue of chastity," Petri said. He told CNA that while the banner itself may have symbolized a wider agenda to some, it was important to consider both the potential effects of making the burning a public event, and the discernment of the bishop - in this case Cardinal Cupich. Petri also pointed out that in serious cases, if the matter in grave and the priest disagrees, he should reason with his bishop about the request and, if necessary, appeal to the Holy See. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
#Burning gay pride flag free
When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.Īs part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. "Clearly, no bishop could command a priest to do something against the divine law, but, short of that, every priest, in my view, needs to give his bishop the benefit of the doubt and be obedient upon first request."Īt Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. "We priests promise obedience to the bishop when we are ordained," he said. But Petri said priestly obedience to his bishop is not a light matter. Some Church commentators have suggested that Kalchik was right to go against Cupich's instruction. "Excuse me, but almost all of the cases are, with respect to priests, bishops and whatnot, taking and using other young men sexually. "I can't sit well with people like Cardinal Cupich, who minimizes all of this," he told the Chicago Sun-Times. Kalchik appeared to criticize openly his archbishop, Cardinal Cupich, whom he accused of downplaying the Church's teaching on homosexuality and of rejecting a link between homosexuality and sexual abuse by clergy. In an interview after the flag was burned, Fr. In this case, it is not clear if the Archdiocese of Chicago objected to the burning itself, or to the public nature of the action and the apparent symbolism it was intended to convey.
I presume the same is true for banners and hangings used in the sanctuary of a Church but I don't know that this has ever been stated." This is why they are burned or buried they are given to God completely and so rendered unusable to us. "Items dedicated for the worship of God cannot be used for any other use. Ukrainian Catholic bishops in US beg prayers for peace in their homeland Read article 18 that the archdiocese threatened him with "canonical penalties," the archdiocese told CNA that there was no discussion of potential consequences for burning the flag because Kalchik voluntarily agreed to comply with the instruction. While Kalchik told the Chicago Sun-Times Sept. When news of the announcement spread the following week, the archdiocese contacted Kalchik and instructed him to cancel the event.Ī spokesperson for the archdiocese told CNA that the archdiocesan vicar for clergy telephoned Kalchik, instructing him not to proceed, and the two had "mutually agreed that the event would not take place." The newsletter said that its previous display had been "sacrilegious." 23, it was found "just when the news of the gay predation of Cardinal McCarrick broke." According to a Resurrection Parish newsletter distributed Sept. The banner had previously been displayed in the parish church, beginning in 1991, but had been in storage for a number of years. 2 notice in the parish newsletter, Kalchik said that he would burn the banner, which he believed to symbolize a homosexual agenda contrary to Church teaching, in front of the church building.